Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.
The performance of a decision bound model of categorization (Ashby, 1992a; Ashby & Maddox, in press) is compared with the performance of two exemplar models. The first is the generalized context model (e.g., Nosofsky, 1986, 1992) and the second is a recently proposed deterministic exemplar model (Ashby & Maddox, in press), which contains the generalized context model as a special case. When the...
متن کاملInferring Individual Differences Between and Within Exemplar and Decision-Bound Models of Categorization
Different models of categorization are often treated as competing accounts, but specific models are often used to understand individual differences, by estimating individual-level parameters. We develop an approach to understanding categorization that allows for individual differences both between and within models, using two prominent categorization models that make different theoretical assum...
متن کاملComparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification.
The authors compared the exemplar-based random-walk (EBRW) model of Nosofsky and Palmeri (1997) and the decision-bound model (DBM) of Ashby and Maddox (1994; Maddox & Ashby, 1996) on their ability to predict performance in Garner's (1974) speeded classification tasks. A key question was the extent to which the models could predict facilitation in the correlated task and interference in the filt...
متن کاملComparing Exemplar- and Rule- Based Theories of Categorization
We address whether human categorization behavior is based on abstracted rules or stored exemplars. Although predictions of both theories often mimic each other in many designs, they can be differentiated. Experimental data reviewed does not support either theory exclusively. We find participants use rules when the stimuli are confusable and exemplars when they are distinct. By drawing on the di...
متن کاملOn the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization.
Averaging across observers is common in psychological research. Often, averaging reduces the measurement error and, thus, does not affect the inference drawn about the behavior of individuals. However, in other situations, averaging alters the structure of the data qualitatively, leading to an incorrect inference about the behavior of individuals. In this research, the influence of averaging ac...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Perception & Psychophysics
سال: 1993
ISSN: 0031-5117,1532-5962
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211715